Hi Steven! As a white man currently dating an Asian trans identifying as a woman, I can not thank you enough for providing inspirational profiles! Thank you Liz for your courage. Although we can always tell we are being looked out when out on the town, knowing there are others like us always makes it easier for me to be in my Trans-Pacific partnership. I long for a day when people do not giggle or awkwardly turn away, and I know it is coming. Thanks.
Liz, This came in from a reader just now. I guess you'd put this in the "hopeful" category.
Aw, that's so wonderful! Thanks so much for sharing, it's great to know that you both are doing well, despite haters! Yes, I long for that day too--but by being out in public and living our own authentic lives, we can help to make this change!
I just wanted to thank all of you for your advocacy and your willingness to be a public figure. There are so many issues that need attention right now, it's hard to know where to focus. I'm so grateful for people who are working on the issues and in the fields were I have no expertise or am not sure how to help. Individually I can't stop everything that's awful but together - together, we can resist. And I know being public comes at a cost, so...thank you.
Liz, This is from a reader and I think a thoughtful question is hidden within. Has there been a cost to you in going public? Or have the benefits more than offset some of the challenges?
Wow, this really warms my hear. Thank you so very much for the thoughtful comment! I think there's definitely been a cost of more people saying hateful things, but like I said, I do my best to ignore the hate, or sprinkle it with empathy and love when I have energy and time. And, overall, showing others that despite the hate, being represented matter and promoting trans people--and preventing us from being erased--makes it so, so, soooooo worth it.
Steven, the link to Liz's story is not working from here. Thanks "This transgender person wants to help you understand her experience."
Try this link. Sorry.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/civilities-this-transgender-person-wants-to-help-you-understand-her-experience/2017/01/27/743d4b96-e3f5-11e6-ba11-63c4b4fb5a63_story.html?utm_term=.a9f58b9f475e#comments
I see no evidence Trump has anything against the LGBTQ community. I am not a fan of his, but I think your headline saying "the State of LGBTQ in a Trump World" assumes that he is anti-LGBTQ. Please explain. Thanks.
I'll answer this one since I wrote, "The State of LGBTQ in a Trump World." I'm not sure why you read that as assuming he's anti-LGBTQ. I didn't actually write, "The Frightening State of LGBTQ Life in a Trump World," which I might have. But there's no question that President Trump is not a friend of the LGBTQ community. Look at the examples of some of his high level appointments. For instance, Vice President Pence has a long record of opposing equality. Please take a look at is record in Indiana. Now, it may be true that the president has his ire and focus on other groups--like Muslims, Mexicans--but that doesn't mean he's a friend of equality and inclusion. Here's a post-election column of mine on this very topic.
I also recommend the Solomon column in the New Yorker that I referenced a earlier.
I'm not a Trump supporter, but I'm hearing from a couple of gay friends that they're (literally) afraid Trump is going to round them up. This seems beyond hyperbolic, considering he's on record as being pro-gay rights. Why -- and this is a serious question -- the hysteria? Is it simply because he was elected with an (R) after his name?
Thanks for your question. While I don't think President Trump is going to round LGBTQ people up, I do think the concerns from the community about his vision are not only understandable, but warranted. Despite saying the letters "LGBTQ" at the RNC, Donald Trump consistently endorsed anti-equality positions. He committed to appointing anti-equality judges to the Supreme Court, a promise he fulfilled thus far with his nomination of Judge Gorsuch. He has promised to sign Kim Davis-style discrimination into law. And he has nominated, from Mike Pence to Jeff Sessions, vehemently anti-equality individuals to some of the most senior positions in his Administration. The community heard and saw all of these things.
But even if Donald Trump had endorsed pro-equality positions, we must also remember that LGBTQ people are Muslims, we are immigrants, women, people of color, and people with disabilities and when Donald Trump attacks any one of us, he is attacking all of us.
I am very concerned when people constantly talk about impeaching President Trump. I think there are aspects of VP Pence's known positions that are much, much worse. And he and Paul Ryan would get along like crazy making things much more efficient. Do you agree?
I'll take this one. Talk is cheap--as they say. And there is no legitimate talk of impeachment currently. Yes, Pence and Ryan are likely to make better (political) bedfellows--but we should stay in the present, focused on the issues and votes ahead.
I am deeply frightened by the damage a Trump administration will likely to do many minority groups across the country, but I also recognize I live in California where protections for LGBTQ's are pretty solid. Is it naive thinking that certain states will be fairly safe for LGBTQ people? And how can we best help our brothers and sisters in states where that isn't the case?
We have made some remarkable progress in states like California. I come from the great state of Delaware, which has also seen historic progress over the last eight years. There is no question that for those of us who live in pro-equality states, our experience will be dramatically different than the experience of individuals who live in states without explicit protections. For many across this country, over the last eight years, the federal government was the only entity protecting their rights and helping to shield them from discrimination. For them, our efforts to preserve our progress becomes that much more vital.
For those of us living in states that have led the way, we must never forget that there is always still work to do. California, for example, continues to lead the way in pushing forward new or innovative ways to expand equity and equality for the LGBTQ community. That work remains important. But, to your point, we must also fight for the same-sex couple in Arkansas or the transgender student in North Carolina or Texas who see their state legislatures passing or considering anti-equality laws and who worry that the federal government may not be there for them anymore. Dozens of states are poised to consider hateful and discriminatory bills this year alone. I certainly encourage you to visit HRC.org as we continue to work to push equality forward, change hearts and minds, protect our progress, and stop hate in its tracks. Organizations like the ACLU and Lambda Legal are also doing important work to preserve our rights through the courts. All of these pressure points matter in the coming years.
There are places like Iran and Cuba that offer state-funded trans surgery before offering equal civil rights to all LGB and T and there are places in the US where psycho-social resources are limited for such life-altering decisions. What are your thoughts about how the already difficult decision-making process might be impacted for those who have such limited resources, limited information, and are encouraged to follow only one option to feel more whole? Second part. Did you feel your resources/choices were limited in any way?
Thanks for this question. As with many issues facing the trans community, we've seen unprecedented progress over the last several years in access to competent and inclusive care for transgender people, including transition related care. More and more states are taking the steps to ban discriminatory blanket exclusions in insurance plans that deny treatment and services to transgender people for the purpose of medically necessary transition related care, despite the fact that same care is provided to others. At the federal level, the ACA provides protections in this area, with regulations specifically banning the discrimination I mention above in all federally funded health care programs. These advancements have been life-saving for the trans community and highlight the need to preserve the ACA in the years to come.
But even with these protections, transgender people still face a dearth of competent and inclusive providers in many areas of the country and it underscores the fact that our work is not just legal, but also social. We need protections, but we must also do the work of training providers and health professionals on being inclusive and affirming of transgender people and patients. The work of organizations like the HRC Foundation to push forward inclusive and equitable policies and practices in our hospitals and workplaces becomes even more important now.
Hi Mr. Petrow - I'm a church secretary and often need to address correspondence to our members. I have a question about how best to address envelopes when I'm contacting a family. There are a couple of factors at play: firstly, there are several different families in the church with the same last name. I know in the "olden days" I would have addressed them to "The John Smith Family", "The Steve Smith Family", "The Adam Smith Family" etc to differentiate the different families of Smiths. However, this now feels old-fashioned and sexist. Secondly, of course many of our families are headed by women. Can I write "The John and Jane Smith Family", "The Beth and Mary Smith Family", "The Jenny Smith Family"? It seems long and awkward to write out both first names, but just putting "The John Smith Family" when there is a wife or partner in the home looks awful to me in 2017. Thanks for your help.
Ah, a traditional etiquette question! Thank you. yes, it might take a little bit longer to write out a longer name, a hyphenated name, or two names -- but I'm hoping that this has come up before -- oh, maybe 20 or 30 years ago when women started keeping their "maiden" names after marriage. The new examples you give are perfect and what I really like about them--and I think the recipients will, too-- is the use of the word "family." That's what we all want to be recognized as. Keep up the good work--and thanks for your question.
Other than the Human Rights Campaign, what organizations should we be donating to in order to help those on the front lines of fighting for our rights?
That's a great question. In addition to HRC, organizations like Lambda Legal and the ACLU are doing important work in the courts to protect LGBTQ rights, among other important issues. Organizations such as the NAACP, NCLR, Planned Parenthood all deserve our support as well. We are going to need to stand together not just because its the right thing to do, but also because its the only way we can defeat the hateful and discriminatory policies coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.