I'm curious as to whether all the Redskins had to pass this drill. I'm a 28 year old marathon runner, in excellent shape, and it sounds brutal to me, especially in this heat and humidity. Maybe football players are in better shape than I give them credit for!
Two Redskins players were close to having to perform the drill -- Andre Carter and Rocky McIntosh, Andre because he had surgery and missed some workouts and McIntosh because he hadn't signed. They were told they would have to do the drill if they didn't get their participation numbers up to a certain level (I don't know what that level is). They did, and they avoided the drill. But they knew what the drill was and were preparing for it just in case.
I certainly don't think it's a piece of cake.
And good morning, everyone! I was Redskins Park yesterday and did perhaps the stupidest thing I've ever done. Was it:
a) locking my keys in the car
b) leaving my keys in my unlocked car
c) leaving my keys in the ignition and the car running for all of the morning workout
So nice to see Adam still in our uniform (even though so many baseball insiders are saying we should have traded him).. What do you think the chances are that they keep him?
That's the big question. They can still trade him until August 31, I believe the date is, for waiver trades. I still think they'll re-sign him but it's not completely over yet.
Did they bring their own food in when they attended the Mystics game? Would you let your child and her friend eat and drink anything from the food concessions there? Bet their are several Secret Service SAs chugging Pepto right now.
I can't imagine they don't have rigid rules for screening good for the President and his family. Would I want to eat there right now? Not particularly. But this problem has been going on awhile now and thousands of people HAVE eaten there. I'm not trying to downplay the issue, but there hasn't been an outbreak of anything. Perhaps that's just luck...I said before, if you start to think about how and where your food is prepared, you'll never eat out again.
I'm not about to say Jim Zorn was a great head coach, or even that he was a very good head coach, but it's tiresome to hear that he "spend the majority of his time with the quarterbacks", that "there's a new sheriff in town", and a repeat that while "...former head coach Jim Zorn spent almost the entirety of practice working with the quarterbacks, Shanahan prefers to patrol the field more like a CEO." Jim Zorn, when he was hired, was coming from being a position coach to becoming the offensive coordinator; he came here, as good a player or position coach as he was, without having broad coaching experience. And, not telling anyone anything they don't already know, he was elevated from being offensive coordinator to head coach, in part because no one else took the job. It was too good an opportunity for him to refuse, just as no one here would refuse a significant promotion if they were offered it. But no, Shanahan isn't the sheriff in town; he's a head coach. Period. He's an experienced coach, and experienced head coach, but he's the head coach. Not sheriff or talk show host or auto salesman, he's the head coach. As for Kyle Shanahan being the one who helps with the quarterbacks, the difference is, unfortunately, the Redskins previous head coach came from what he did best (quarterbacks) and tried to continue doing what he does best, working with and helping the quarterbacks on a team that needed quarterback help, along with a lot of other help. And, like it or not, Coach Zorn depended on a coaching staff that, for the most part, he didn't select, and for which he was dependent. No opportunity to succeed was given to Coach Zorn; every opportunity has been given to Coach Shanahan to succeed.
I'm not a fan of the "sheriff" comparison. Just like I'm not a fan of comparing a football game to a war or a battle. It's football.
I don't agree with much you said about Zorn. He knew he wasn't anyone's first choice and he was working with an inferior GM. I do think it's a good set-up now, with Shanahan paying attention to more than just the quarterbacks; it was pretty obvious last year that Zorn didn't really pay attention to the defense. That gave Blache a lot of power.
... clicking on the sports section, looking at the week ahead in chats, and seeing five straight days of FSF (or, as we call it in my house, Hamiltime!) on the schedule. Woohoo! But I also noticed the announcement of Cindy's new blog. I love a new blog, of course -- doesn't everybody? -- but is it wrong that I was mostly interested to see that she's grown her hair out, and that it made me wonder what kind of shampoo she uses?
You should ask Cindy on her new blog; I'm sure she'd tell you!
How many losing seasons will it take for you to stop praising these guys as if they are somehow methodically transforming the Nats into a superpower, rather than simply cheapskating their way into last place?
Um... I've never written a word about the Lerners, good or bad. I do think Rizzo is doing a decent job and I have written that. And I'll stand by that at least for the rest of the season.
Hey, hey, hey, no test today... So, is it just me or is this conditioning test about to blow up in Shanny's face? Al isn't winning the PR debate, but he keeps getting the outcomes he wants. Al doesn't want to play NT, and it seems like he's not going to have to. He didn't want to go to OTAs, and he didn't go. He wanted to get all the bonus money, he got it. Now, he doesn't want to practice and he doesn't have to as long as he continues to fail/not take the conditioning test. Brilliant!!!
Yes, I was thinking about that yesterday as I watched him trudge past into the building. He's missing a lot of hard work. This is the strangest game of chicken I've ever seen.
This has become a popular question in the past week and I understand why but can we introduce these people to a little concept called reality? Yes, I am willing to take a bold stand that rodents and food meant for human consumption don't mix (I'm funny that way), but if there was a problem with the food being served to thousands of people on a virtually daily basis, wouldn't have noticed something by now? Like a massive outbreak of illness at the games? Besides, even at the cleanest ballpark, you're eating a HOT DOG, for Pete's sake? What do you think is in there?
Yes, this is my point as well. If you have ever worked in a restaurant you know way too much about the food preparation areas, the hygiene of the employees, etc. And yes, hot dogs are not made of sugar spice and everything nice. Every now and then I get a craving for one but I ignore it.
is 20,000 Phillies fans going absolutely silent when Ryan Zimmerman crushes a Brad Lidge pitch. Followed closely by 20,000 Nats fans screaming for joy at the top of their lungs. Best night I've had at the ballpark in a very long time.
Yes, that must have been fun.
All the baseball talking heads are saying the Nats blew it by not trading Dunn. When did the law get written that says teams that are out of contention must trade all their assets to the contenders for minor league prospects that by percentage don't make it in MLB? I think this system keeps the same teams at the top. Rizzo was right to ask for the moon and the stars for Dunn.
No disagreements here. He had a high asking price and no one met it. A lot of the contenders think they can raid the also-rans; Rizzo was letting it be known that they can't. I don't think that' s a bad thing. But now they need to re-sign Dunn.
I noticed a lot of sports writers, you included, second-guessing Shanahan's dealings with Haynesworth. Isn't it possible that Shanahan knows what he is doing here, and that ultimately Haynesworth will come out of this a better players, or will be exposed for being a lazy loser that we don't need anyway?
Um, again, what? I've not written a WORD about this since the testing business began. I'm not second-guessing Shanahan. I do wonder how he will end this situation gracefully, but I don't think he cares. I'm not against the drills.
First I was worried that they were going to trade Dunn, then I was happy that they didn't, now I'm being brainwashed into thinking that they blew an opportunity to get prospects for an aging player and that they will lose him anyway to a higher bidding team and end up with nothing except some draft picks. Can you help me out Dr. Hamilton?
I bandied all the sides of the issue around quite a lot before I wrote that they shouldn't trade him. I can see the argument on the other side, believe me. It's not cut and dried. The key is, if they were going to keep him, they have to believe he is re-signable. Deep breaths.
Why can't the Redskins make Haynesworth practice with the team to learn his new position, get in some grueling workouts instead of hopscotching around garbage cans, and still make him pass the conditioning test? Won't the daily work outs improve his conditioning more so that the trash can drills? Albert doesn't seem to be moving so fast in the footage I've seen on TV of him doing those drills. Make the dude sweat and learn his position.
This has been suggested and I think it has some merit, but it doesn't allow the team to send a clear signal that if you don't follow the program, you suffer. They don't want him to be fit by his trainer's standards; they want him to be fit by THEIR trainer's standards. Hence the drills.
If he doesn't pass the conditioning test, we don't want him here because he is not as fit as the rest of the players. So why is it a problem that Shanahan is making him take the test....I mean, how can we possibly be worse if he fails? We were 4-12 with him last year, and he missed 25% of the season, and nearly 50% of the plays when he was playing. So, isn't it possible that what Shanahan is saying is that he has no value to the Redskins if he can't pass the test?
Possible. I also think time is on Shanahan's side. Haynesworth wouldn't have played much in the first preseason game, but if he has to spend that game on the sideline in street clothes ... every NFL player wants to play. That may be the one thing they all have in common.
As an Orioles fan, I think he's doing a much better job than Andy MacPhail! Nats took 2 of 3 from the Phils over the weekend, O's lost 3 of 4 to KC. I hope I'm wrong, but time will tell.
As a Royals fan, it was nice to see the Orioles for four. Poor Baltimore. I don't know the Lerners well enough to like or dislike them, but I can't imagine most Nats fans wouldn't rather have the Lerners than Angelos.
C'mon, Mike, give it (and Fat Albert) a rest Let him practice with the team! Never thought I'd feel sorry for Haynesworth, but I do. Plus it's a huge distraction. Side point: despite 2 great Nats wins on Fri. and Sat., lead story on local News at 11 was Haynesworth, both nights. I know t his is a Redskins town, but that is still disappointing.
This is the problem with discipline -- it's unpleasant to see it actually enforced. Everyone wanted Haynesworth punished to some degree when he was skipping workouts and mandatory camp. Now that it's happening, it's no fun to watch. But if Shanahan gives in now, it's like giving in to your kid when he gets a timeout and his lip quivers -- that's going to be one spoiled kid. Haynesworth is getting a timeout and it's a very public one.
"Shanahan is walking a fine line here. Haynesworth seemed to be trying to make amends with the Wednesday meeting; Thursday comes and he gets put through the wringer. I have NO problem with that. But you have to know when to let up. Is today the day to let up, after he's made his point? Apparently not -- Rick Maese reports that he failed the test again. The key for Shanahan is knowing when to give a little as well. It appears as of now that he's not giving yet. I think if this daily humiliation keeps up he hurts himself. He sends a definite message, but even the players who are mad at Haynesworth are going to start siding with him because he is one of them, in the end. You want the respect of the locker room, and to get that you have to show respect to the players. I'm no fan or apologist for Haynesworth, but this could backfire on Shanahan." Why did you just say you haven't said a word about this?
I meant I hadn't written a column about it. Yes, we've talked about it in the chat. I thought the players might start to resent Shanahan if this continues, but after being out there yesterday, I am not sensing that yet. Do I think this could backfire? Yes. Do I think he should give in. No. Yesterday was my first day out there and in general the discipline and seriousness of camp is very different than last year. What's going on with Albert is in line with that. And the players seem to be much more worried about learning their new systems and making the roster than worrying about Haynesworth.
There are a myriad of reasons that the Nats shouldn't trade Dunn, but chief among them for me is the fact that he is one of the more recognizable stars on a team that is still trying to build its fanbase. Trading the guy who is (with Zimm) the offensive face of the franchise is a bad idea. The Nats are still trying to convince people to come to the park on days when Strasburg isn't pitching. You don't make a good argument by trading away your most powerful hitter (and a guy who wants to stay here!).
...but a sweep would have been better. The fact that we blew it (and had some ump help, I think) makes it harder to look on the bright side. One big upside that I did see was that Nats fans were at the Park and loud. I was there on Sunday and any chants of "Let's Go Phillies" were properly drowned out. Folks were even initiating "Let's Go Nats" chants on their own. The hometown fans showed the Philthies that NP is not Citizen's Bank Park South (which don't flow at all, like "Fenway South" does--not that I like that either).
Good to see a nice crowd on a Sunday afternoon when the team is out of contention.
It seems to me that, right now, Miguel Batista can have anything he wants. So what should he ask for? The closer's job? A regular rotation berth? Shortstop? Albert Haynesworth's signing bonus? Miss Iowa's phone number?
I'd go with Albert Haynesworth's signing bonus. Miss Iowa is a Cubs fan so there's no future there.
Looking at the Nats yesterday, the bottom half of the order had no pop and low averages. Looking at the P-Nats, the batting has a bit of power, but only a couple regulars hitting above .260 or so. Is there anyone in the pipeline elsewhere in the system who can help out? And what's up with Bryce Harper?
This, to me, was the downside of the Nats' two trades -- that they got more pitching and almost no hitting. I still think the trades were good ones but they do need some hitting help. Bryce Harper tweeted this weekend or late last week that he would love to go back to college for a year. Truth or negotiating tactic? Hard to tell.
Nice of the Nats to bring her to DC, and great Teddy gave her flowers, but what was she so upset about? She's a nice looking woman, but she's not Miss Universe. At least she made a decent pitch! The Nats seem more attuned to good PR moves than their neighbor to the North, with their ridiculous game-day surcharges.
It was a nice move by Batista and the Nats, and it wasn't her first baseball game, which was refreshing as well. A win-win for all, which is rare.
Not sure I agree with a comment you made Friday that DC fans tend to pick one team and ignore the others. The Skins are king in DC because football is king everywhere. The problem is that there are too many people in DC that didn't grow up there. I love the Skins, Caps and Wizlets equally, though I will never cheer for the Nats over my beloved Orioles <insert snicker here>. One of my best friends is gaga over all things Atlanta. We once took in a Hawks game at the old Omni (great arena, by the way), and the place was like a church on Sunday. He said Atlanta just had too many transplants that cheer for other cities' teams. I thnk Washington has the same problem. The same can't be said for places like Philly, Cleveland, Detroit and up here where I live now in Packer/Brewer crazy Milwaukee.
Yes, the transplant argument has some validity, I think.
Miguel Batista. I mean, first, he's already a published author. Second, the "Miss Iowa" quote. Third, when asked what he hopes would happen when he meets Miss Iowa: "Hopefully she says, 'Oh, he was a cool guy. He looked like a low-budget Vin Diesel, but he's nice.' " I mean, c'mon, is he good or what?
He's great. Maybe we should get him to do an online chat. Paul??
There isn't an athlete in Washington (including Ovechkin) who rises to the occasion like Zimmerman. I have a feeling that when he gets to October baseball he'll be clutch. A most underrated superstar.
October baseball? What's that? Let's hope he gets that chance; it would be well-deserved.
Okay, no one guessed at my boneheaded move yesterday at Skins camp but the answer was c). I also came back with a very mild case of heat stroke, I think. Jason Reid will never forgive me for forgetting my hat!
Sorry I couldn't get to the all the questions today. I'll try again tomorrow.