My first question was, "When did I sign up for this?" I never signed up for robocalls. I have since learned that there is a number to call that you can opt out of ALL communications with the district. But all or nothing seems like overkill.
Isn't there a way for parents to opt out of the system, other than unplugging the phone?
My first question was, "When did I sign up for this?" I never signed up for robocalls. I have since learned that there is a number to call that you can opt out of ALL communications with the district. But all or nothing seems like overkill.
I'm an Arlington County parent, and I don't get why PG County needs to do a robocall at any time. You can sign up for Arlington to send you a nice, quiet e-mail when school is canceled or delayed. Those who need to know early in the morning can check their e-mail or go to the county website or call a hotline for a recorded message. If you can't even opt out of the PG County robocall, that's particularly maddening.
Especially since I knew about the late school day, I was a little extra peeved when I had to wake up at 4:30 to hear a message that told me that I can sleep in...
Actually, for me it was a simple calculus: What tools are at my disposal which will allow me to deal with this problem most effectively? I could throw myself against the Prince Georges County School district bureaucracy and write an angry letter or lodge an angry phone call... or I could do this.
This seemed like the more effective use of my time. It was also coincidentally more satisfying.
To answer your question directly, no. I don't think I carried this too far. I don't plan on doing this again, because it was effective. Hopefully I made a few people smile and think, which is a victory.
However, I would agree that the national attention to this issue IS carrying it a little far. I think I just struck a nerve with people.
Thanks. And that was the whole point. I didn't want to get mad, I just wanted to be effective. And I think I succeeded. I'm sure that the PG County school district will not be making any more 4:30am calls. So as far as I'm concerned, it was a very effective use of my time.
The article mentions that as a lawyer Mr. Titus knows a thing or two about technology. But did you bother to know a thing or two about the law? As a lawyer myself I regularly counsel organizations on robocall issues. Federal law explicitly requires a person making an automated call to identify himself or herself at the beginning of the message and provide his or her address or phone number at the end. There are also time of day requirements. Before you came up with your plan or talked to the Post shouldn't you have done your due diligence and made sure your plan of vengeance was legal?
Yeah, probably. :-)
I figured that the school district was just following the Golden Rule, though: They were doing to me as they would have me do to them.
Well, you can call me "vindictive," "juvenile," "childish," or any other thing you want. I wouldn't call myself vindictive. Childish? Perhaps. Posessing sleep-deprivation-induced creativity? Perhaps.
I was looking for something low-impact that would get my point across. I didn't do it to "get back." I did it to make sure it wouldn't happen again. It was a low-impact way to make sure that PG County would re-think their robocall policy.
Aaron, Great job! Would like your take on the scourge of political robocalls and the lack of privacy that voters experience every election cycle at the hands of politicians and interest groups. I'd like to see someone do the same thing you did to politicians' home phones and family cell phones. You in? Shaun Dakin Founder - The National Political Do Not Contact Registry www.StopPoliticalCalls.org
Well, I can't say that this is a call to arms or anything. I try to assume the best about my elected leaders, which is why I assumed that they were following the golden rule. I'm sure they didn't mind too much...
And Shaun Dakin at StopPoliticalCalls.org does great work.
This wasn't about revenge, it was about effectiveness. Calling the district is decidedly LESS effective. Mirroring the district's behavior was far MORE effective.
As a side effect, it also happened to be far more satisfying.
I'm not entirely sure. I tried to make the caller ID read "PG County Parent." But apparently it didn't work.
This is my first (and hopefully last) time robocalling, so I may have not placed a setting correctly.
I think the schools get blamed when they send out too much information and when they don't send out enough. They can never seem to get it just right. I know I got a few robo-calls from the schools after my students had graduated. It seems they hadn't purged the list from the previous year. But, then again, if they had, I am sure someone would complain they need to register for alert messages every year.
Being a school administrator is a thankless job. While I personally believe that the world would be better if robocalls ceased to exist, I also recognize that some parents lack internet access, and robo calls are the only way to contact them.
My gripe isn't with robocalls in general... just robocalls at 4:30am.
I'm glad you enjoyed the 4:30am call. I was pretty sure that there are at least 3 parents in the school district who like phone calls at that time in the morning. But for the rest of us, robocalls might be helpful, but they're more annoying than informative at 4:30am. A little later would have been much better.
My thoughts exactly.
I also have to wonder, "Why is this news? This is silly. It was supposed to be silly."
Yes, I think an opt-in system would be great. If you have to wake up at 4:30am to walk the dog, then sign up for robocalls at 4:30!
An opt-in or opt-out option would be great in a situation like this.
Looks to me like a bunch of those commenting on you are not fans of you. There is one guy who says he's already filed a bar complaint, and there is talk even here of you breaking federal law. Does this cause you to rethink at all?
There is very little in life I take seriously, least of all, myself. I'd actually prefer to think about my full-time job right now.
Well, I'm glad I could make you smile (and think). That was the whole point. And hopefully the school district doesn't hate me for the rest of my life.
Although I agree, part of me wonders why this is news at all. This is frankly a non-story as far as I'm concerned. There are much more important issues to focus on in this world. This was a silly response to a silly phone call.
FYI, this was NOT a one-time incident. This was the second time my wife and I have received the 4:00 a.m. wake up call from the county. We placed many calls to opt out but not a single school official had a clue. Good for you Aaron.
Thanks. Apparently the previous angry phone calls didn't do the trick, so hopefully this will make a difference. With any luck, it will be the last 4am phone call.
Using Google Voice to scren phone calls is great. Unfortunately, I can never tell when a phone call is actually going to be important. Occasionally the school district calls me with useful information. I just would prefer not to get it at 4:30 am.
But this isn't the only way! Why not set it up so that those who are uncertain CALL IN to a recorded message? That's how they do it in Arlington, and I sure haven't heard anyone clamoring for robocalls.
There are lots of ways to get information to parents. I know that there is no silver bullet, though. I happen to use the internet... but not all parents have access to the internet. Some people prefer text messages, but others never check their phone. So I understand the need for multiple contact strategies.
The school district should just make sure to use the contact methods in a reasonable manner.
School districts have the thankless job of trying to reach out to as many parents as possible, using as many media as possible. I recognize that it's hard.
Hopefully now PG County Schools know that robocalls at 4:30 in the morning are out-of bounds. I'm sure it won't happen again.
Good point. But I didn't expect it to take on a life of it's own. Perhaps I was a little naive.
Thank you. Yes, you'll notice that the robo call doesn't contain a single bad word, or even a "jerk." I said what I meant, and there's no need to be angry when you can say what you mean.
That would be great, except that I have five small children. And I can't ignore them.
Thoughts, comments, suggestions or criticisms about The Post's Live Q&As? Send us an e-mail.
Become a fan of Post Live on Facebook.
Follow @WashingtonPost on Twitter.