Interesting comment. In the broadest sense, Rick Perry is a pro-business conservative Republican, just like Bush. But I think the contrasts between them are interesting and worth exploring.
Looking forward to this chat about Perry and Bush. Also if you're interested in Rick Perry, you should check out this piece in the Times and this one in Politico as well.
Interesting comment. In the broadest sense, Rick Perry is a pro-business conservative Republican, just like Bush. But I think the contrasts between them are interesting and worth exploring.
I think you could read the story to say he is more conservative than George Bush.
Yes. He has said he is opposed to tax increases. His annoucement speech repeatedly attacked Obama on this issue in fact.
Perry was Texas campaign chairman for Gore in 1988. I don't have a list of all of Perry's views then, but the Democrats in Texas at that time were much more conservative than Democrats nationally today.
My guess is Rick Perry for now is working on winning the Republican nomination, not convincing the world of anything right now.
I do not know the answer this question. But I"m curious and will be looking into these kinds of questions.
Why would the GoP let Mr Perry get anywhere near the nomination, knowing full well that the people would instinctively a see him as G. W. Bush 2.0, the man who almost singlehandedly destroyed the Republican party?
I think these electablility questions are always hard to answer. And ultimately, voters tend to pick candidates they like. Democrats I don't think picked Obama based on electability
He has a team of longtime advisers, but I think this will change as he moves to the national level. The issues are just so much more complicated, and governors have very little to do with national security.
Well, I would start with lots of Republicans 1. aren't big fans of Medicare and Social Security 2. aren't following every statement Perry makes. I think these views will be vetted more carefully in next month's debates.
If I were the White House, I would fear Romney, who is more moderate and might be a stronger general election candidate. I tend to think the money won't matter that much; the Republican Party and outside groups will make up the difference.
I think in 2008 we did stories comparing the policy views of Bill Clinton to Hillary Clinton and Obama. I think the comparison is important.
How will his book Fed Up affect his run? I live in Texas and consider Perry part of the GOP fringe and not a serious candidate, so I have been surprised at how quickly he has risen in the polls. I think when the voters get a closere look he will fade as Bachman has. Now he is the shiney new object. I am not complaining about the press coverage of Perry. It is the job and duty of the press to vet the candidates. Thank you.
I think Perry, because of his record as governor, will get a longer look from establishment Republicans than Bachmann and that will help him go the distance in this race. I do think the debates are critical for him to show the depth of his views.
I think my story and others in the Post have looked in detail the implications of these politicians views. And you saw the New Yorker piece on Bachmann. Palin is not running, so a little less important to evaluate her views.
Well, I think there's a big difference betweent Obama and Romney or Perry on a host of issues, starting with health care and the economy.
Perry and Bush both back lower taxes on individuals and businesses, making it harder to sue companies and doctors, health care reform that favors approaches like health savings accounts, etc. They have a ton in common.
Bush's brand of conservatism had a big emphasis on the "compassion" side, trying to use conservative means (tax incentives, etc. ) to take on problems generally viewed as more Democratic issues (say education)
Everyone Perry is trying to win right now is a conservative or a Christian. I think he is looking to win the primary now, general election later.
I think this is broadly correct. Bush, to be sure, was a conservative on a number of issues, but Perry might be even more so.
The Post has written extensively on all of these subjects, as has the New York Times.
So, so, so, yesterday.
Well, without ascribing to your descriptions of judges, I would assume Scalia/Thomas. Romney would approach this the same way.
From a pure political standpoint, yes, you are right. Dems will try to make Perry or Romney the next version of George W. Bush.
A good point.
I think the Republicans will start laying out more detailed plans in the next few weeks. Romney is giving his jobs agenda later this month. One thing: Republicans are the party that believes in less government. They won't have a nine-part plan on every issue.
And a very pro-Perry comment.
I will end with that. Thanks for the questions everyone.
Thoughts, comments, suggestions or criticisms about The Post's Live Q&As? Send us an e-mail.
Become a fan of Post Live on Facebook.
Follow @WashingtonPost on Twitter.