Hi Ian. Thank you for this story. It was quite emotional and though my question isn't related to the details of the narrative, I want to convey my deep sympathy for the Swers family in the face of their loss. As a social media professional and a writer, I spend a lot of time griping about what I usually dub the ever-growing "approximation" of real life through the growing scope of social media outlets. On Facebook, for example, pictures, videos, status updates, profile details and more combine online where they create a kind of cyber-persona - one that, in most cases, is intended to approximate the identity of a human being in real life. Your story was particulary interesting to me in that it dealt with a woman who was very vitally linked to Facebook. It was presented as a (or perhaps, the) main mode of communication with those closest to her. I'm wondering whether, in editing her Facebook feed, you felt as though her status updates and the responses to them truly did convey the reality of the situation of her life; basically whether this is, in your opinion, an example of social-media-approximating-real-life or social-media-as-real-life. I'm also just curious as to your thoughts on what stories like this mean for journalism. Of course, a journalist's role always includes framing the story, but usually it also falls on the journalist to tell the whole story as well. In this case it seems that social media might be changing this paradigm, as here we see a subject who is able to tell her own saga, even after death. Any thoughts on this?