Good morning Dr. Gridlock, I am not an alarmist about the social causes of the fight on metro or on violence in DC in general, but rather someone who is a bit concerned about Metro Transit Police's response.
By my count this is the third brawl on Metro this summer (Union Station, Bethesda, and L'Enfant). In all three cases we are talking about police response times in the tens of minutes. While vague comments about extending curfew hours are a nice political sentiment, it doesn't solve the immediate problem.
That Metro is becoming unsafe outside of rush hour (to say nothing of barely functioning outside of rush hour). I have two questions that I haven't seen answered yet. Why do non-transit police not respond to these instances? In the case of Bethesda, the Montgomery County police barracks are a block away, yet response time was in excess of a half hour by Metro police. In the case of L'Enfant, there are multiple DC police stations within 6 blocks of the station.
Metro police have shown a demonstrated inability to respond to situations in a timely manner. Which leads me to my second question: Outside of pre-planned scenarios where everyone is well notified in advance, what is Transit police response actually going to be in a terrorist situation? Terrorists have targeted transit systems in Tokyo, Barcelona, London, and Moscow amongst others. These attacks need not be at rush hour when Metro police are present to be effective- an attack on a crowd leaving the Kennedy Center at 10 or 11 p.m. on a weekend would do the same trick. Is it now time to question whether Metro Transit has the resources to respond to an actual emergency situation?