We need their continuous support, we need them to remind all countries that we have a high responsibility and no more time to talk, we must act now
We need their continuous support, we need them to remind all countries that we have a high responsibility and no more time to talk, we must act now
The next Conference, COP17 will be in Durban, South Africa. The COP changes "regions" of the world and within regions some countries volunteer to be host. At COP meetings countries confirm these proposals
This is a very good point and it has been floating around COPs for long time. The issue of historical emissions or cummulative atmospheric burden has been discussed extensively. It is complex, there is a lot of literature under the so called name: the brazil proposal. It is difficult to estimate precisely the level of responsibility of each country but it is a fact that emissions accummulate in the atmosphere
The problem of solid or municipal waste is still big in Mexico and in many developing countries. This problem has a link to Climate Change in different ways. As you know, poor handling of waste generates a lot of Methane, which is many times more powerful as greenhouse gas compared to CO2. But good management of the waste could offer sustainable ways to generate energy and help both local authorities and rural communities. There is a growing number of municipalities in Mex that begin to handle wast trough landfill sites with methane recovery, I hope tha Chiapas moves quickly in that direction
I think that in all countries we are going to need a strong cultural change and we are going to need it quickly. Cultural and behavioral issues often determine the political space for decision makers. If people want SUVs , the governments will find difficult to persuade car manufacturers to bring better technologies. Solving the CC problem will require that all of us work constructively and respectfully with countries such as China and India. I often find that media and public perceptions about what countries are really doing do not coincide with reality. Having said that, we also know that for political reasons some countries adopt official positions that are hard but domestically they are doing substantial efforts.
Ups, I just lost 2 paragraphs, here I retype again... There is very solid evidence that CC is real and that it is caused by human activities. The false debate has been fueled by people that do not want the negotiations to succeed. Pseudo-scientists often paid by a few organizations linked to some high carbon industries keep producing information and media pieces to confuse people. It is unfortunate that even Congress people and representatives in some countries adopt this position. I would invite everybody to read more about this, but be attentive on the sources. Some organizations are disguised as think tanks but they are just professional campaigners at the service of some high carbon and very influential industries that do not want any change and do not care about millions of people threatened by climate change.
I am not familiar, sorry.
You are absolutely right!! but I have good news for you. This will be the first COP that is fully neutralized in terms of CO2 emissions. However it would be much better if we begin using more some available information technologies for people to communicate remotely instead of just keep jumping on planes (or cars) and produce large amounts of CO2
As always there is an important chinese delegation here, I would say that they have been acting responsibly They are participating in the negotiations constructively, we hope that they will find together with the USA delegation a compromise formulation for the controversial issue of Monitoring, Reporting and Verification as well as the International Consultation and Analysis, so that we can complete a balance package. I am hopeful. Even Japan, that had a terrible attitude on the first two days now are behaving better, allowing for the negotiating atmosphere to be good to reach agreements
All countries know that the USA has very little room to manouver. Although they have promissed to meet their goals even without a Climate Bill, we know that it will be a difficult task , full of domestic challenges for the EPA. What we need from the USA here is flexibility and a bit of compromise so that we all can move forward. I am sure that they will do their best in the few days ahead of us in the negotiations.... wish us luck....
Thoughts, comments, suggestions or criticisms about The Post's Live Q&As? Send us an e-mail.
Become a fan of Post Live on Facebook.
Follow @WashingtonPost on Twitter.